A Fictional Dialogue
Breakfast At Champions
You haven’t heard it because our thought is controlled. Only the correct opinion is allowed to be published. In the first place the notion of being politically correct comes from the Stalinist era of the Show Trials of the thirties. No deviant opinion was allowed; all opinion had to be politically correct according to Stalin’s guidelines.
Therefore before anyone dared express an opinion they first had to check with their Commissar for the correct slant. Earl Browder, the head of the American Communist Party served that purpose in the US. Reds had to ask ‘What does Earl Say?’ before they dared to express their opinion and then it was always the same as Browder’s. Therefore, as you say you are PC you have to check all your opinions against a central authority. Hence you are not free to think as you like; hence you are a slave to another’s authority. I can’t do that; I’ve got to be free. Freedom of conscience is everything to me. But then, different strokes for different folks as they used to say. You need the security of knowing you’re right.
(makes growling noises as the truth of the statement sinks in) That…that’s not…entirely…true.
Sure it is, Craig. Or else it isn’t possible for you to be sure of being politically correct. But, let’s get back to the Irish Catholic, John F. Kennedy.
Racial motives can’t possible enter into the Kennedys. Besides Dewey it has been scientifically proven that race doesn’t exist. Do you know that ninety-nine point six percent of the genes of every living human being are the same. What do you have to say about that?
Well, for starters, ninety-nine point six is not the same as one hundred percent. What you have just told me is that four tenths of one percent of our genes determines race.
That’s an inane argument since we all come from the same source along with rocks and trees and birds and bees. The genetic makeup of everything comes from the same source.
We’re gentically one with rocks? Puff away, Dewey.
Craig, we took geology together. The Earth has a molten core. Everything that is on the crust which is dried molten core is identical with the core. Life as we know it arose from the ‘living’ water that exuded from that core and continues to exude to the present day.
The water is so strong in life giving propensities that even though photo-synthesis isn’t possible at present depths chemical life forms are created.
If you believe in evolution then according to its proponents all life proceeded from a single celled organism. All genes have arisen from this organism. That they have differentiated along the way is self-evident. Even so the majority of genes must be shared by all organisms, even rocks.
Therefore you can prove that species don’t exist either because all life is genetically identical. Therefore the elephant is not a different species of being. It’s just a human with a different configuration.
If you are going to to be politically correct then you should insist that your Commissars think these things out before they speak.
In addition your objection to race is that if race exists then other races are inferior to your own. This is the universal premise behind the genocide which is being practiced by every race in existence. I don’t think one race is inferior or superior I just accept that they are different and have developed separate racial approaches to managing reality. I’m sure that even the politically correct will admit that there are different approaches to reality and they are not equal or else how could you be politically correct?
The question then is are all approaches equally productive? That’s the question not physical identity.
So, the Celts have their characteristic way of looking at reality that is different from the Anglo-Saxon.
For instance, the Irish speaking of Ireland refer to it as the Old Sod while they refer to the United States as the New Island. Language and words are very important indicators of feeling. New Island can only be an extension of the Old Sod thus both localities are Ireland in the Irish mind.
The Irish have always used the New Island to carry on the war on the Old Sod against the Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
Actions speak louder than words. Joe Kennedy not only supplied arms to the IRA but as I said he openly sided with the Nazis while Ireland itself remained neutral in the conflict which in the circumstances was a very bold move.
Jack was in office for three years but one of the first things he did on an official trip to Europe was to snub America’s premier ally- England.
I don’t remember that.
Sure you do. He went to the European capitals first, which in itself was considered a snub of England, then on the way back he spent a few hours in London but three whole days in Ireland.
I mean no unkindness to the Irish but Ireland was, is and always will be an inconsequential backwater of civilization. There can have been no political reason for that visit except to show the Irish they had come into their own. The Old Sod and New Island were one. The Once and Future King had returned.
Indeed, in those three short years Camelot was reinstituted on American soil with John F. Kennedy as the reincarnation of the Celtic monarch Arthur. Jackie was no Guinever but then if she had been replaced by Marilyn what a double cheeseburger that would have been, hey?
Marilyn Monroe? There wasn’t any question of Jack Kennedy divorcing Jackie to marry Marilyn Monroe.
Don’t lose your sense of humor, Craig. It’s one of those historical what ifs. Besides you aren’t considering Marilyn’s motives. I think she thought it was possible. But that’s neither here nor there. I’m sorry I brought it up.
Anyway, I think it’s pretty clear that old Eire-land is in the saddle having captured America from the Anglo-Saxons.
Words and symbols, Craig, they’re dead giveaways. Think of what Jack Kennedy did in those incredibly action packed three years. A lot of fantasticks thing that Jack Kennedy was going to wind down the Viet Nam war. I don’t know what they’re smoking. South Viet Nam had been fairly well Catholicized under the French. The Church had a pretty good toe hold which it would lose if the Communists gained control.
The campaign against Communism in the United States was directed in large measure from the Vatican. Had the Communists gained control of Europe all three major churches- Russian and Greek Orthodox and Roman Catholic would have been eliminated not to mention their parent Judaism. The Roman Catholic Church was fighting Communism for its very existence.
All of the really important anti-Communists were Irish Catholics- Father Coughlin, Parnell Thomas, McCarthy, all of them.
Richard Nixon wasn’t Irish.
It depends on who you call important but OK, I exaggerate for effect. Anyway Nixon wasn’t destroyed by the Reds, at least until the seventies, so they couldn’t have taken him very seriously. Martin Dies wasn’t Irish either but he was destroyed.
The Kennedys themselves were ardent anti-Communists and Catholics. Bobby served on McCarthy’s committee and Joe Kennedy had Joe McCarthy up for dinner.
So you want to tell me that Jack was going to be soft on Communism in Viet Nam? I don’t believe it. Another first thing he did was create an elite Army Corps called the Green Berets. Remember them?
Symbols, Craig. Don’t you ever ask yourself why green? Green is the color of the Emerald Isle me bhoy. Celtism forever. Remember in ‘Kim’, Kipling’s book, ‘Kim’, his father tells him to look for a red bull on a field of green and they will make his fortune for him.
The Red Bull of Cooley on a field of green was the flag of his dad’s old Irish regiment. Kim was Irish if you remember. Jack just took off the Red Bull of Cooley; but, if you look closely you’ll probably find a little bull in there.
So scratch cooling off Viet Nam.
By the way, the Army changed the color from green to black after Jack died. I recently saw where the entire Army was assigned black berets and the Special Army Corps objected so they assigned tan berets to them. Know what the nickname of the British troops occupying Ireland was? The Black and Tans. Coincidence? Probably, but isn’t it amazing how those coincidences add up?
Now, by sixty-three it was clear that the neo-king of Camelot was as shoo-in for the sixty-four election. He’d had such perfect press coverage he would have taken at least sixty percent of the vote even if Jackie had divorced him and she did threaten to do that if he didn’t stop seeing Marilyn.
After Jack Bobby would have been a shoo-in for eight more years of the Kennedys with Teddy in the wings there were eight more. Who knows who would have been next but that was a twenty-five year dynasty of Irish Catholics in Camelot.
After twenty-five years of Celtish rule who can tell what the country would be like except that the Anglo-Saxons had lost their inheritance. They’d not only lost it but their good will had been betrayed. They had offered a helping hand to the starving Irish during the potato famine and now rather than combining with their benefactors the Irish robbed them.
Don’t get me wrong, Craig, I don’t dislike the Irish as people. They’re great company, but their racial motivations have to be discussed under a separate heading. The Irish are essentially ingrates. They not only came here during the famine but they also flooded England where they disrupted the wage scale by providing cheaper labor impoverishing English laborers for decades. The English gave them employment in the English Army. If a helping hand hadn’t been extended the Irish would have starved in their millions.
What gratitude did they show? They burned down the queen’s chief residence. They robbed the Anglo-Saxons of their own country. These are just facts; there’s nothing you can do about them.
Now, Craig, let me ask you, why do you thing John F. Kennedy was shot?
Because he left us no choice.
Wait a minute, wait a minute. In the first place I believe that Oswald was the lone assassin who killed Kennedy for his own reasons but now Sam Giancana and the Mafia are claiming responsibility.
Oh right, Craig. C’mon, the question is who is manipulating who. We may never know, but then that’s the purpose of conspiring. The chief conspirators are so hidden nobody can find them if they’re any good. The lone assassin thing didn’t hold up; everybody, except you obviously, easily saw through that. In their hurry they botched up the Warren Report.
So, nearly forty years later it gets out that Giancana thought he was being double-crossed by the Kennedys because they were reneging on what he thought he was due for helping get them elected. And it was substantial help. Get that, the Mafia got him elected. So Giancana orders a hit on Kennedy in Dallas by a nut. Did you ever ask yourself what was in it for Oswald. Nothing.
Bill Bonano of the New York Mafia even claims that Johnny Roselli was the real trigger man who fired the actual shot that did Kennedy in while he was standing on a rung down in a sewer when the car drove by. How’s that for military precision?
All I can say is that if the Mafia was involved then Lee Harvey Oswald may have been the patsy but the Mafia was the Fall Guy of Plan B. If history is any guide when Plan B fails they’ll fall back on Plan C, the Scapegoat. By that time it will be ancient history, everyone concerned will be dead and no one will really care.
The assassination was cleverly handled but the real reason Kennedy bought it was because the Irish Catholics had captured the US government from the Anglo-Saxons and weren’t about to return it. I repeat, he left us no choice.
OK, OK. I’m not saying I’m going for this racial crap about Celts and Anglo-Saxons but where does his being Catholic enter in?
Viet Nam for one. Ok. So I got a wedge in on the racial theory. I’m really trying to demonstrate to you how Madison Grant’s studies apply before I get to the big swindle with the Chinese, known of old as The Yellow Peril.
The Catholic influence. Well, Craig, you have to ask yourself what it means to be Catholic. It must mean something or why call yourself one. It’s all in the education. It’s like being Jewish. If there is no Jewish agenda or program then it is meaningless to say you’re Jewish. Jews have this special education; I had mine as a Protestant Methodist which colors every opinion I have whether I will or no. The Catholics have theirs.
A Catholic must think of Catholicism as the true religion. So on the face of it the Church is and must be intolerant of every other religion and secular belief system. You may object, but I saw William F. Buckley of the National Review representing the Catholic viewpoint on a panel discussion and he said out loud that his religion as the true church forbade his admitting the validity of any other viewpoint.
You know of the Catholic Index of Proscribed Books. It therefore follows that freedom of conscience is not a tenet of the Catholic Church. You are either religiously correct or a heretic. Sounds a lot like your politically correct credo doesn’t it?
Now, if you are brought up to believe that your church and hence yourself is the only possessor of the truth and all other beliefs are lies it follows that you will probably think you are in possession of the truth and your opponents are devils who are willfully trying to thwart you.
That is essentially what Kennedy thought. You probably don’t remember General Walker, Edwin Walker, but I was scandalized by his treatment.
I don’t know what General Walker’s beliefs were but he was scathing in his evaluation of Kennedy. Kennedy’s response was religiously or politically correct in the negative sense. He didn’t try to refute General Walker or tolerate his difference he declared the man insane for disagreeing with him. Jack Kennedy had General Walker, a man with a distinguished military record in the Army of the United States, committed to an insane asylum.
An insane asylum!
Shades of Soviet Russia. I immediately recognized Kennedy for the irresponsible bigot that he was. I disliked Kennedy from the beginning but I despised and hated him from that day forward.
I’m really surprised that nobody remembers what I’m going to say next but I was terrified by the plan. Kennedy’s idea was to discharge all the mental patients in America. As I remember it they were to have subsidized housing in every neighborhood in America. Then the mentally ill were to report to the block house on every street. Some person was to be designated as block big brother.
If anyone was denounced as crazy as in the case of General Walker they were to be placed on the list of the mentally ill being required to check in with the block big brother for indoctrination regularly. In that very Catholic manner there would never be a chance of the Presidency ever passing into Anglo-Saxon hands again. Any who dared to challenge the orthodoxy of the Celt ascendancy would immediately be declared mentally ill and neutralized. Or in religious terms they would be heretics, infidels, anti-Semites or politically incorrect.
Well, you know, along with every other Anglo-Saxon Republican I was opposed to the Once And Furture King Of Camelot. I’m sure all but die-hards like me would have converted to Democrats the day the plan was passed. I lived in actual fear that Kennedy’s plan would be realized.
So you see, when I heard he was shot my question was is he dead? When I heard that news I danced and sang.
Kennedy’s approach to political opposition was precisely the result of his Church education about orthodoxy. I felt that General Walker was avenged when Kennedy was killed. I don’t have to tell you that General Walker lived in Dallas.
You think that General Walker killed Kennedy then?
No. I don’t have any idea who the actual conspirators were other than a general sense of direction but, remember, Kennedy was told not to go to Dallas. Jackie publicly begged him not to go. It was common knowledge that an attempt would be made on his life if he did. I knew that it would happen and I was an absolute nobody who read only the papers, Time and Newsweek.
I don’t remember that at all.
I seem to be the only one who does. So, anyway, his Irish Catholicism was negating everything that Anglo-Saxon Protestantism stood for. And then the Negro revolt was heating up pretty strong. I can’t imagine that his handling of the Negro problem had anything to do with it but it is possible that he was thought to be making untimely or unnecessary concessions to them.
Well, it would go without saying that the conservatives were opposed to Negro rights.
Yes. I suppose. But remember the most important decisions in Civil Rights were made under the conservative Eisenhower. Brown versus the Board Of Education in fifty-four and Central High in Little Rock in fifty-seven were real milestones. All of the initial events had already taken place when Kennedy was elected. It is true that J. Edgar Hoover was a real enemy of Mike King but would he go so far?
Who is Mike King?
Martin Luther King before he changed his name.
King changed his name?
Sure. He was born Michael King. Changed his name but didn’t drop the Junior so his father was Mike King and there wasn’t any Senior. Although after he and Bobby were shot down in sixty-eight the whole atmosphere changed. There was a kind of relaxation, a certain tenseness went out of the air although the Black rebellion continued unabated. It was more like with Nixon in the White House things were back under control.
Then, somewhere in there the Blacks began their separatist program.
You mean to say you think that Africa-Americans are trying to separate into their own country within the United States?
I think so. They ethnically cleanse every neighborhood they move into; they will almost certainly demand the status of an autonomous people. Everything depends on how you look at it but they have already staked out certain economic areas as well while territorially they seem to be packing an area in Illinois and Indiana. They are active in cleansing certain areas in Mississippi for instance. They will almost certainly take over Chicago as a starter.
Take over Chicago! How are they going to do that?
Are you kidding? You Liberals get incensed because Hitler used the democratic process to establish an authoritarian government and you don’t know how the process works. Or is it that you don’t think it can happen here, or if it does, it will be just. The end purpose of both Hitler and Kennedy was alike. If Kennedy had gotten his mentally ill program thorugh he would have executed the same type of coup as Hitler did.
It’s easier than you think. You just don’t have any respect for the rules, that’s all. You make a new game or, as you Liberals now say, a new paradigm. Every city in America is governed by a board of elected councilors. They call it the City Council. I don’t know how many Chicago has but all the Blacks need is half of it to control the city. They may even be able to come up with more than half and then Chicago is theirs. Gary, Indiana and East St. Louis belong to them already.
The laws were all written in such a way and social realities are such that in housing Blacks are favored over Whites.
You know, Dewey, we must see things very differently because the way I see it the housing laws are written to provide equality not preference for anybody.
Once again, Craig, it all depends on your perspective.
I don’t deny that was the intent but the intent of the Constitution of the United States was not to provide a way to establish a dictatorship and yet it does so for anyone so inclined. Whether you’re willing to see things in the round or as a perspective of your intent in the problem you’re facing in understanding is what I’m saying.
There is no question that the laws as they were written intended to make housing open to all. But, in practice, there are very few White people who have any desire to move into solid Black neighborhoods. Nor would I advise it because Blacks are going to be much less tolerant of Whites than vice versa.
Watch your TV set very closely, Craig, you can see what I’m talking about happening before your eyes if you will only open them. In certain real life situations filmed in integrated neighborhoods you will see colored kids, meaning Blacks, Mexicans and whatever crowding to the front while the White Kid or kids cringe back. If you think in an integrated neighborhood a White minority is going to get fair treatment, Craig, you’re the one smoking those funny little cigarettes.
Hence, as in Chicago, an influx of Blacks will displace Whites from the city. In the old days they called it the Flight to the Suburbs. An influx of a few thousand Black families and Chicago is part of the Black Autonomous Republic.
On the economic front they have appropriated Basketball and Football as their profit centers. If you watch TV, I mean look at it, Blacks have appropriated at least half of the acting jobs in shows and movies and at least half of the opportunities in commercials. In all three areas they have displaced Whites from lucrative jobs which require nothing in the way of education. Real lumpenproletariat functions but remunerative.
In Madison Grant’s terms they have flushed their racial competitors out of those areas. This stuff is really interesting to observe if you can get rid of your prejudices and see things as they are. You’re watching Grant’s Great Race commit suicide.
So you think there will be an African-American Autonomous Republic and an Irish Autonomous People. What else?
I didn’t say anything about an Autonomous Irish People but as the process develops anything is possible. You know, the Pope has ordered changes in the parochial school system to bring instruction more in line with Catholic doctrine rather than American methods. He is able to do that because the tremendous influx of Catholics into the country has either given the Church a majority or will soon.
So as the ‘Nativist bigots’ feared the country is being increasingly governed by Rome.
Catholic influx: Well that’s a new one on me. Where is this Catholic influx coming from?
Aw, Craig, c’mon, man. You’re a really smart guy. What do you think all these Mexicans or Hispanics are? Catholic to the man. They just keep coming.
They’re really dangerous too. Almost as much as the Yellow Peril.
How can some impoverished poor people seeking a better life in our prosperous country be a threat. Don’t you think they just want to be like us?
If I weren’t more aware of racial and psychological realities I might. I just have a harder time adopting the Bwana attitude than you do. The machine gun makes us all equal, Craig. Those Columbian dope runners who fight pitched battles on American territory don’t strike me as poor inoffensive campesinos trying to milk their big rich Whtie Northern neighbors out of a few meals.
I see them for what they are: aggressive all-male bravos fully as capable as any White man in equal combat, machine gun to machine gun. That Bwana mentality you enjoy is real hard for me to grasp. I don’t see oppressed African Americans, poor Hispanics or little yellow Chinamen. I see a fully armed and dangerous group of peoples out to smash the White hegemony established in the Seven Years War. And it is racial my old friend. Our colored brothers are quite conscious of their racial identity.
Taking advantage of our legal system and goodwill the Mexicans are invading the Southwest to ‘reclaim’ what they think is their birthright. You Liberals should try to deal with historical realities rather than this sappy Bwana superior attitude.
Number one, the Mexicans have never gotten over the shame of being conquered by fifty or sixty White guys in armor on horses. This defeat is a livid scar on their psyches.
Secondly, the Spaniards after having conquered the Aztec Empire centered on the Valley Of Mexico then claimed in the name of Spain, not Mexico, the whole lower half of North America from the Oregon border in the West to Florida in the East.
When the Mexicans revolted against Spanish authority they claimed all the lands that nominally belonged to Spain. The Mexicans had no real claim to Texas, California and the Southwest. The citizens of those areas who revolted against their new overlords, the Mexicans, had every right to do so just as the Mexicans had the right to revolt against Spain or the United States to revolt against England. If you want to talk prior rights Mexico then still belongs to Spain and the United States to England. Don’t do things by halves. Restore the former order or shut up.
If those new States then chose to align themselves with the United States instead of Mexico, and who wouldn’t, they had every right to do so. The Mexicans have no claim to those areas but they believe they do.
The indigenous Indian tribes get rubbished every way. What used to be Apacheria is totally disregarded.
So all these Mexicans flooding in are not looking for a higher standard of living by sucking off us big bad Norte Americanos as you say but they are merely occupying the land in the time honored method. We are being invaded. They will force the Whites out in the time honored racial manner described by Madison Grant.
I don’t think they will be successful, mainly because of the Chinese but like the Blacks they are going to be able to establish autonomous areas where Anglos won’t be welcome. That means you and me.
Are we going to get to the ‘Yellow Peril’ now?
Not just yet. First we have to deal with that very touchy subject, the yeast or leaven.
The yeast or leaven? We’re going to talk about bread now?
No. We’re going to talk about the most important and sensitive element of the racial mix of the United States: The Jews.
The Jews? Why yeast or leaven?
Well, if you have studied Jewish history at all and bear in mind nearly no one else has, even among the Jews, except for a few odd balls like me and some half-crazed Rabbis, and I don’t know anyone else but me who has looked into the subject.
I’ve even talked to a few rabbis in town and except for following the party line and being defensive they don’t know much.
First off, Craig, let me say that historically all the modern trends that began in the French or Great Revolution as the Reds call it have now established easily followed patterns. This is no longer the nineteenth century when all these incipient movements were gestating or even the first half of the twentieth century when enough of the web had been woven so that the complete picture could be formed by the mind. All you need is the desire to see things as they are and not project your fantasy of how you would like them to be on reality.
So, apart from denials and obfuscations the Semitist game is clear.
You haven’t become an anti-Semite have you Dewey?
There’s the issue Craig. That’s an obfuscation, turning immediately to the ad hominem. There is no clear definition of what constitutes an anti-Semite. As a point of fact the ADL- Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith- a private organization maintains files on three milion, what they term, ‘known’ anti-Semites, in America.
As you can see the notion reeks of paranoia. If they believe there are three million known anti-Semites how many ‘secret’ anti-Semites are there? Are we only looking at the tip of the iceberg or is it possible that every American is a ‘secret’ anti-Semite? Are we all out to get the Jews? Hmm? Think about it.
Did you ever see the movie ‘Men In Black?’ Well, it’s kind of a metaphor explaining the role of ADL in society. Speilberg directed it. It’s the Men In Black’s job to seek out and destroy those concealed anti-Semites that only they can recognize. They don’t turn them into the authorities because the anti-Semites haven’t committed any crimes they are only waiting patiently for the opportunity.
Apart from the paranoia one might ask how these anti-Semites are known. There are no objective criteria for determining the status. The rest of society doesn’t really care. In fact a known anti-Semite is whoever anyone in the ADL says is an anti-Semite. Someone could turn you in and you’d never know. Just all of a sudden friends would start turning their backs on you; you’d come under scrutiny at work and little difficulties would start cropping up on a regular basis. God would have unblessed you because you weren’t blessing the Jews.
What kind of things?
Well, in my case I was arrested on trumped up charges and had to defend myself to the tune of thirteen thousand dollars. That was fun.
What did you do? They couldn’t arrest you without good evidence.
Let me add to your education Craig. Sure they can. They can do anything they want with impunity. If they haven’t captured the DAs office then they have enough people in it to do what they want.
In conjunction with the Liberal Coalition, you know, the Women’s Movement, NOW, the Homosexual Movement and those so-called holy groups.
Not only can they do what they want but furthermore they have complete immunity. You have no recourse. They are above the law.
Surely you jest, Dewey.
Surely I don’t; this is no joke, I’ve learned the hard way. That’s the only way otherwise you would never believe it. I’d seen it on TV dozens of times and always sided with the law but now I know better. I consider the law my enemy.
(softly) That’s really strong Dewey.
Well, as they told me, we’ll just have to let the chips fall where they may. The fact is that the DAs office can commit any crime with impunity. They have absolute immunity. Understand the power we have given to these people. They can be irresponsible and get away with it.
I was arrested on no more than the uncorroborated sayso of a woman on no greater charge than I had offended her sensibilities. That was the whole charge, no crime had been committed or claimed.
(emphatically. laughing.) Aw, c’mon Dewey. You’re stepping off the ledge.
Life is obviously more complicated than you think. You knew me in California, Craig, but you don’t know who I am in Oregon. You may not believe it but I am more of a somebody than you see. If you remember I came up here to get a Masters at the UofO in Eugene. jFor various reasons that became an impossibility so as you know I opened a poster store, couldn’t sell enough posters so I turned to records. I was born to sell records so my store prospered accordingly. I was hip, long hair and all that so people really wanted to buy records from me.
In the social climate of the times everyone thought that record stores were just covers for dope operations to it therefore followed that I was a dope dealer.
You never used dope when I knew you. When did you start?
Ay, there’s the rub, Craig. I didn’t start. I didn’t have anything to do with drugs. But the truth doesn’t matter in situations like these. They thought I was quite literally the biggest dope dealer on the West Coast if not a mastermind for the world drug trade. They thought that I had Swiss bank accounts bulging with illicitly gained money; they still do.
I was under twenty-four hour surveillance, my house was gone through on a regular basis as well as my car or van when I wasn’t in it. They couldn’t find anything because there wasn’t anything to find. There was absolutely no evidence that I even so much as smoked a joint but that merely showed them how clever I was. I mean, you know, they ran a mail drop on me, my phone was tapped, they opened my merchandise shipments and inspected them before they delivered them to me. Finally I decided to go down to UPS and pick them up myself.
One time UPS had a box sitting in the middle of the floor with all four sides laying flat and the records exposed.
You complained about that loudly, I suppose.
It was against the rules for me to complain. Sure I was loud but so what. I was told that was the way it was and if I didn’t like it I could kiss their ass.
I found the proposed alternative unpalatable so I realized that the law meant nothing to them and they had no intention of observing any laws where I was concerned. I am only thankful that they at least didn’t plant evidence when they were in my house or car. But that’s the way Oregonians are. They have no self-respect and no sense of decency. The only way they look at the law is as a protection for themselves.
I can understand why you’re a little sore at them, Dewey, but you do seem a little extreme.
Well, he was no favorite of mine but as Barry Goldwater said: Extremism in the defense of liberty is no offence. Besides look at what they did to Diane Downs.
Is that the woman who shot her kids?
Whether she shot her kids is open to question but they’ve had her in jail for decades for a crime she almost certainly didn’t commit.
I’m not too familiar with the case, Dewey, but they must have had some evidence.
No, they didn’t have any evidence, they just didn’t have any other explanation and they wanted to put her in prison. There was more than reasonable doubt. Her story made a lot of sense to me.
How did her story make sense to you when it didn’t make sense to the jury?
You’re not familiar with the Eugene-Springfield area. Those people are really hard on people from out of state, especially people from California. They’re rabid and, man, I mean rabid. Diane Downs was new to the area having come up from California. Apparently she thought she could screw her way into acceptance because as I understand it she was hard at work.
Anyway, I am familiar with the place at which she stopped when her kids were shot. It’s a little bridge over this small creek that might be called the Marcola, I forget. Anyway the area is called Marcola. It’s real small. The road runs up through a narrow valley. In the very late sixties this place was a haunt for revolutionaries. They built concrete bunkers up in the hills where they stored guns and ammunition, radios and the like for the coming Revolution which they thought was imminent.
They even had mobile radio units ready for operation. They knew about triangulation and all that so they were prepared to move from place to place to avoid detection. They dressed very colorfully in French Resistance outfits. I did you not.
In addition to that Marcola was a recreation area which was haunted by criminal types. Marijuana was everywhere. One time there were a group of campers by the creek when these idiots stood in the flood light asking What as they were shot down with deer rifles from a truck. This Marcola was mean do-wrong daddy kind of place.
I knew this guy who lived in Marcola and Jeannie and I visited him and his girl friend one night. Round about midnight he jumps up and says we have to leave immediately. We were driving back toward the highway when we came to this bridge over the creek. As we drove up this literal shaggy haired man came up from under the bridge obviously under the influence of something and stood in the middle of the road waving his arms for us to stop.
Believe me I wasn’t going to stop. There was room to drive around him so I did. You know, these guys are all crazy so he’s shouting obscenities at us as I drive slowly on looking back. I see this other big round guy come up from under the bridge waving a hand gun. I stopped looking back and stepped on it and left them in the dust.
Now, here’s the kicker. I don’t know the exact distance to the highway from the bridge but it’s not more than a mile. If you’re not familiar with Springfield it’s really hard to know which way to turn in the dark so, just like Diane Downs, in my excitement I turned left into the mountains. You can’t tell which way you’re going until the McKenzie Bridge. The McKenzie river runs down from the mountains through Springfield. Once there you know you’re going the wrong way so you turn around and go back. That’s exactly what Diane Downs said she did. She had an injured child in the back seat who had been shot by a madman so I think she had plenty of reason to become confused.
The Eugene-Springfield DA had to know the reputation of the Marcola area but in their eagerness to convict a Californian they put her away for life just to please their prejudices.
Well, wasn’t she kind of ditso, didn’t she turn the trial into a media event?
Being ditso is not a punishable offence, as yet, and it was not in her power to turn any judges courtroom into a media event. Only the DA could have engineered or prevented it. Since it was allowed to go on I can only assume that the DA thought it discredited his victim and so he used it to help convict her.
The only evidence against here was the ad hominem one of being a ditso. I suppose if the jury didn’t have a shadow of doubt in their minds there was no shadow of doube in their minds but I think the State of Oregon owes at least a commutation of sentence to Downs if not a full pardon for all the difference that would make in her ruined life.
Nowadays because of cable TV we have a handy method to study the characters of lawyers, judges, police and DAs. Cable networks are at a loss for programming so they fall back on a lot of true crime. We get to see a lot of real life court procedures as well as the police and DAs in action and in interview.
Just as the FBI can provide profiles on the type of person who may have committed a crime we can prepare profiles on types of lawyers, judges, cops and DAs.
Always remember that these self-righteous guys were once a next door neighbor who you may not have thought well of. None of these people come from an hereditary occupational class, they are all self-selected for their jobs.
The DAs all seem to be attracted to the job ecause they think the the job will confer virtuousness on them. I dare say you and I can’t think of anyone we went to high school with that we thought was that virtuous.
Since they think the job confers virtuous conduct on them they become extremely self-righteous.
As virtue is conferred on them anything they do is necessarily done for a virtuous reason. Hence they all ‘fight crime with crime.’ Lie to liars, whether the other guy is a liar or not. They become criminals in the name of the law. They also fear failure so that if a crime is committed they must have the instant gratification of seeing someone, anyone, in jail.
All DAs are lawyers. Now, being a lawyer does not mean you are intelligent, goodwilled, honest or anything else, it merely means you have memorized a ton of casework and law and were admitted to the bar. I hae dealt with numerous lawyers and judges and have been impressed neither with their intelligence or understanding and much less with their integrity.
In the first place Diane Downs didn’t have to be indicted. There was no threat to society. She had an unusual story that couldn’t be checked out but was plausible given the circumstances I outlined. Heck, they even checked her hands for powder burns and found none which she would have had to had if she had recently fired a handgun.
Besides the Da must have had complaints about those guys under the bridge if they operated that way for years which they evidently did. He knew that Fall Creek was a high crime area.
It was not necessary to indict her at that time. The case could have been put on a back burner.
So why did the DA think it was so necessary to make a media circus out of the trial. I certainly don’t know but the DA is the one who stood to benefit the most.
Very likely he had a crime and an unusual story so in his self-righteousness he adopted an attitude and then presented innumerable ad hominem arguments against her since he didn’t have the necessary evidence to convict.
The DA did exactly the same thing against me. Even though he had no evidene to connect me with drug salses or even use he was convinced that since I ran a record store I must be doing dope.
So that’s the substratum of the reason why Barry Schunch had me arrested.
The proximate background of the reason to arrest me was, I think, this.
After the Stonewall riot in nineteen sixty-nine the homosexual community became very aggressive in practicing their ways. Being the record business I had a huge increase in the number of sexually explicit covers. Since homosexuality is sado-masochistic in nature and since the object of their distaste is women a large number of those sexually explicit covers involved the sado-masochistic treatment of women. If you remember there were some real shockers as the envelope of pornography was burst asunder by the homosexuals.
Now, the Lesbian part of the homosexual community took offence at these covers. They, of course, being mentally and emotionally disturbed blamed the emphasis on sado-masochistic sex portrayal on the heterosexual male rather than the homosexual male out of perverted solidarity.
Rather than attack the producers of the porn they decided to attack me who only stocked the records as the man who could stop the covers if I wanted. All I could do was shake my head in wonder. I was too young and inexperienced to deal adequately with psychotic behavior of this type., Besides who took the situation that seriously? My detractors looked at me shaking their heads and saying: This too shall pass so those covers would pass too and they did. But that’s neither here nor there.
I wouldn’t voluntarily take hit records off the shelf. The first act of the Lebians was to boycott my store. One beautiful Saturday morning I am driving to work when a homosexual radio DJ announces that there will be a demonstration at my store beginning at twelve o’ clock. Perhaps the intent was to get me to capitulate, get rid of the records and get them to call the demonstration off. If so, the notion didn’t occur to me.
I was pretty prominent at the time running thousands of dollars of radio and TV commercials a month so I guess they thought they would get pretty good media coverage. They didn’t know that I was being given the silent treatment by the media. It was forbidden to mention my name in the Daily Assassin while all pictures of my street used on TV were closely cropped to eliminate the showing of my store. So no reporters and TV cameras showed up.
So then they decided to creat a riot. They invaded my store screaming and shouting, standing up on the racks waving red flags and the whole works. I was pretty slow. I should have had my head someplace where there was better light. Actually the customers all thought this idiotic demonstration was just a publicity stunt of mine. If I had kept my cool and stood back laughing uproariously everyone woud have thought it was just a good joke.
Of course, the demonstrators would have torn my store apart but that’s another consideration. I called the cops. Remember when I quoted Dylan: The cops don’t need you and man, they expect the same? That’s how it was. The cops were not very enthusiastic about quelling these lesbian creeps but when nothing seemed to be soming of it they wound down and left. Damn them all to hell.
But, the covers were still there. Next they came into the store and slashed about a hundred covers with knives. Well, I’d gotten used to treatment of this sort over the years both in Eugene and Portland so I didn’t think too much of it in the press of events. I merely sent the records back as defects.
That wasn’t the response the Lesbians wanted so they published a story in their newsletter taking credit for the deed. The next thing I hear is some cop on the phone saying they had read this story and while they didn’t care how ‘we people’ treated each other they thought this was going too far. They offered to press charges against the Lesbians.
In fact, I’d completely forgotten about the slashed covers and if the cops wanted to extend a helping rather than a hurting hand I was immediately suspicious so I told him that the think had never happened.
Thus I thwarted, quite unintentionally, the Lesbian intent of creating a scene.
There last attempt to creat a scene was when they got a television crew of Lesbians affiliated with the same radio station which had announced the riot to attempt to how the ‘artistic value’ of record covers. I told them they could photograph whatever they liked. They thought they had me in their trap. They immediately went to this particular record cover and asked me to come over and explain its artistic merits. I refused to appear in their ‘video essay’ so they packed up and left.
I thought that was the end of it until I was arrested, Christ, you know, twenty years later.
So that’s the background of why DA Schunch would arrest me without adequate cause.
The whole legal operation was conducted without my knowledge because the DA didn’t give me a chance to defend myself at a hearing against patently absurd charges.
The Office fabricated an arrest record for me. I was never even spoken to but there is apparently a file that shows that I was arrested, brought in and released on my own cognizance. Next it was there duty to give me a hearing to determine probable cause of arrest. They scheduled the hearing within ten days of the time they say they arrested me but somehow forget to notify me so it looked like I refused to appear for the hearing.
The charge I had been arrested on was some incredibly lame City Ordinance that said that if, this is how the mighty legal brain of Portland works, a person thought that someone had it in mind to commit an act against either their person or their belongings they could have them arrested. So this complainant who I’ll give the improbable name of Virginia Woolf, said only that she thought that I intended to, I’m embarrassed for she, she said that in the middle of the Esplanade I got down on my knees and tried to thrust my hand between her legs so I could have finger intercourse with her. She did admit that I never established contact with her person and there were no witnesses. DA Schunch decided to prosecute this psychotic woman’s complaint.
At the hearing since I wasn’t there to defend myself, nothing like shooting fish in a barrel, hey? they escalated the charge to menacing. Now menacing is a fairly serious offense. You have to be waving a gun or holding a knife on someone or something really serious to menace someone.
Well, the judge issued a bench warrant and I went blissfully about my business unaware of what was hanging over my head.
Two days before Christmas I found out when at one o’ clock in the morning there was a prodigious noise on my front door and it wasn’t Santa Claus, it was the Sheriff. He wanted me to take a ride downtown with him.
I know you wouldn’t lie to me, Dewey, but what you’re saying is so incredible. I believe you but still I can’t believe it.
Like I say, until it happens to you. Jeannie and I watched many of these stories on TV and found them incredible and unbelievable too but these DAs are out of control. They are irresponsible monsters. Once they got it in their head that I was a major dope dealer way back in the sixties with millions in Swiss bank accouants they were determined that I wouldn’t get away with it. Like I say they ran mail drops on both incoming and outgoing mail, tapped my phones and had me under twenty-four surveillance, ransacked my house and car regularly, found not one shred of evidence that could connect me to dope in any way but still they took the position that I must be guilty because they thought I was guilty. Hurts ’em to be wrong.
How can they interfere with you? Oh, lots of little ways. The ADL works in complete secrecty. Most people don’t even know there’s alist let alone whether they’re on it.
How do you know there’s a list?
Like I said I study Jewish history and affairs. This guy J.J. Goldberg has this book titled: Jewish Power: Inside The American Jewish Establishment, sounds near autonomous doesn’t it? He mentions the ADL files quite proudly for instance. It all comes together.
This is how race, sect, religion or whatever they’ll admit to being operates.
Now, they view all societies as an inert mass of dough without zest or flavor until acting as a yeast or leaven the Jews enter their society to show them how to live.
That sounds kind of anti-Semitic, Dewey.
Tell me. Heresy, infidelity, anti-Semitic, I can’t help but be me because I am not of the faith. Further as I accept a scientific explanation of reality rather than a supernatural one I can only condescend to those trapped in what is an earlier consciousness. The truth is anti-Semitic and the truth is that inferior forms of consciousness must give way before superior ones. They may go screaming and kicking into the night but into the night they must go. Call it anti-Semitism, I don’t care.
Understand Craig, that I do not talk out of the back of my neck or off the top of my head, I am not shooting from the hip, I say nothing that cannot be demonstrted or is unsubstantiated. If you haven’t studied the history you can’t know and we aren’t talking about secret histories or hard to find arcane volumes we’re talking histories published by every leading publisher in the country. Brandeis University Press, you name it.
So anyway, this yeast entered the United States, in numbers, beginning in about eighteen-seventy and continuing unabated officially until nineteen-twenty.
Now this is what the Honky Cat was talking about when he was so loudly booed away from the lectern. That Cat was one courageous guy even if he did cower behind the lectern.
When there was finally a reaction against unrestricted immigration after the Great War the Nativists who had observed attitudes and sabotage during the war wanted to eliminate Eastern and Southern Europeans entirely.
You have to study the War years to really understand what the various immigrant groups were doing. The Intalians, for instance had remained loyal to Italy which they were to do until after World War Two when they finally accepted that they weren’t going back to Italy.
History is full of interesting little oddities. Did you know that the Italians issued a call to Italians living in the United States to return to fight for Italy and a great many went. Wait, that’s not the interesting part. After the War Mussolini wanted to return injured veterans to the United States for medical treatment. That’s just one of the way foreign nationals view the inexplicable US immigration policy.
The Irish had actually helped the cause of the Central Powers with sabotage in the United States on the princible that a friend of England was an enemy of theirs and an enemy of England was a friend of theirs. The most famous incident being the explosion at the Black Tom pier in New Jersey. Of course, in the interests of racial peace in the United States the investigation was never pursured and athe explosion is listed as an accident. There are accounts in which the Irish take credit.
The Jews were an interesting case. They professed to hate Russia and the Czar who they have turned into one of the greatest demons of all time. So long as Russia was an ally of the United States the Jews were pro-German. After the overthrow of Russia by the Bolsheviks, which is to say, the Jews, they became pro-Ally and of course they were always one hundred percent Americans.
The Austro-Hungarians in the United States were suspected of being saboteurs and there are incidents of sabotage by Austro-Hungarians.
And of course the indignities the German-Americans were subjected to during the War years were unparalleled until the Japanese and numbers of German and Italians were interned during World War Two.
In the wake of the War the Nativists wanted to eliminate Southern, Central and Eastern Europeans altogether. The best they could obtain was a quota based on demographics existing in about eighteen-ninety. As Italian immigration only began in earnest after that date that virtually eliminated legal Italian immigration.
Believe it or not the Jews were in the process of transferring the entire Eastern European population to the United States when the war intervened. In order to relieve the strain on New York City and the other Eastern ports while concealing their numbers channels had been established in New Orleans and Galveston to receive the bulk of these Jewish immigrants.
They were packed and ready to go in Europe when the restrictive new immigration law was passed in nineteen-twenty. The Jewish plans were thwarted. In addition as the Jews were a stateless people so entry visas had to be issued under the quota of another State. The Jews may be temporarily stymied but they are not so easily defeated.
They set about conditioning public opinion in America to reverse the immigration act. They got around the laws pretty easily in the aftermath of World War Two. For some reason unknown to me the Americans accepted racial guilt for what the Nazis had done. I never have, not for the Nazis, not for the Blacks, not for Hiroshima, not for nothin’. I didn’t do it and I don’t know anyone who did.
But in nineteen forty-eight the Jewish State Of Israel was established. There was only one flaw in that plan. Asiatics were fully excluded from immigration and Israel was on the West coast of Asia. That meant dual citizenship was limited from West to East.
The Jews were unable to change the law in nineteen-fifty when a revision was made but they were successful in nineteen-sixty-five when the new immigration law was written. Now, what do you think the most significant historical event has been since the end of the Seven Years War?
I don’t think it was this immigration act if that’s what you’re leading up to.
That’s not what I’m leading up to. But it fits hand and glove. The second most influential fact of the last three or four hundred years was the Cultural Revolution begun in China in nineteen sixty-six by our good friend, the lunatic, Chairman Mao Ze Dong.
The two facts were not coordinated in advance of course but the coincidence is a remarkable fact. At the very time Mao was leading the charge of the worldwide Red offensive the door of America was thrown open rendering the country nearly defenseless. This at the height of the Viet Nam War and the Negro Rebellion too. Is it any wonder we were psychologically and intellectually overwhelmed? That refer to me and you too, Craig.
That more or less brings us up to the Chinese situation but I haven’t finished with the Jews yet so I’ll have more to say about their influence.
Americans are extremely myopic not to mention that we are capable of seeing only what we want to see. They see only the the Chinese want to come here. Oddly enough, that flatters them. They do not look for ulterior motives or, indeed, underlying causes. In fact, Americans, which always means White Americans in my scheme of things, are stupid.
We have been warned about the Yellow Peril for some time but we prefer to put a different construction on things and ignore realities. The fear of the Mongol hordes has been on Europe for centuries. Strangely, modern White academic scholars take the side of the Mongols against White Europe. They actually ridicule the Europeans while cheering the Mongols and lamenting their retreat. The self-hatred is one of the consequences of the unmitigated success of the British in the era of European world conquest.
The East was always a source of dnage for Europe. Celts, Germans and Slavs and Mongols all came from the East but the racial difference, which is to say cultural difference was a real terror.
Attila the Hun who entered Europe in the fifth century has always been a byword of terror although in recent years his reputation is being refurbished as some kind of farseeing leader. You see White self-loathing at work.
Then in the thirteenth century the hordes of Genghis Khan penetrated deep into Central Europe before they retired. they weren’t actually defeated they just withdrew back into the steppes while retaining hegemony over the Slavs of Russia.
So a very real fear was implanted in the Europeans.
That was a long time ago, Dewey, that has no relevance now.
That’s where you’re wrong, Craig. Historical memories have relevance over immense spans of centuries. Here’s on e you daren’t disagree with. Twenty-five hundred years ago the Jews suffered some indignities at the hands of this cat named Haman. Every year they commemorate the horrors of this guy. What he did then influences thier attitude toward others today.
As to the Chinese I am led to believe that Kaiser Wilhelm was the first to originate the term, Yellow Peril. W.R. Hearst picked it up from him to illustrate the dangers of Chinese immigrtion into California. And of course Hitler imbibed the fear of the Yellow Peril into his very genes. All three of the men are execrated today but Wilhelm, Hearst and Hitler were right.
Oddly enough the abominable racial pride of the English is the proximate cause of the Chinese Diaspora.
We are all familiar with the Jewish Diaspora but there have been several others. The European Diaspora is prominent but the Chinese Disaspora is virtually unrecognized in the United States. It will never be taught in the public schools.
Somewhere about eighteen twenty or so the British began moving Chinese into Singapore and other areas because they were thought to be more industrious than the aborigines. If the British had had the population surplus of China they might have brought English out but since they didn’t have a big enough population for their purposes they pressed the Indians and Chinese into service.
This of course distributed Indians and Chinese into places they would never have gone on their own. Once jump started the Chinese, who had never left China before began their great Diaspora of which the California immigrants were only a small part. It’s not like they loved America best, as our Liberals like to believe or that they wanted to tap into our bounty specifically but that California was only one of many locations all around the Pacific Rim. The Chinese were not helpless little yellow men seeking the aid of Bwana White Man but they had an agenda of their own.
The Australians sensed the danger quickly passing laws to keep them out. Thus they temporarily avoided becoming a province of China. Doesn’t bother people like the Liberals because they have no actual racial identity or pride. At least, they don’t think they do.
Dennis Kearny and a number of farseeing men who are now termed intolerable bigots sensed the obvious danger of losing California and the West Coast to China so they pushed the Chinese Exclusion Act through Congress in eighteen eighty-two. So the problem was minimized until the Jews undid their work in nineteen sixty-five.
Wait a minute, Dewey, wait a minute. You’re not saying that the Chinese are inferior because they’re of a different race are you?
You don’t believe in the concept of race, Craig, besides as I already told you I don’t have that Bwana attitude that you and your Liberal friends have. You don’t put it in those terms but in your hearts you feel superior to them or you probably put it like you’re more advanced than they are but they’ll catch up in time. You Liberals have euphemisms for everything.
They’re to to catch up and run over you sooner than you think , too.
So, in nineteen sixty-six the Chinese were no longer a backward trampled empire. Under Chairman Mao they were the vanguard of the Red Revolution having displaced the Russians during the war in Korea.
In one act Mao sinicized the peoples of the world. Marshall McLuhan picked up on it during the Great Leap forward or possibly earlier.
Within two years, or by nineteen sixty-eight the Chinese Red influence was apparent on every campus in the United States. I still have two copies of the Little Red Book I picked up from Honky Reds from the UofO.
OK. Talking of historica timelags. Mao had a deep abiding hatred of the West because of its exploitation of China in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Remember all those Chinese artifacts in European and American possession were literally stolen, looted, from the Imperial Palace but even more important was the forcible introduction of opium into China by the British in the first half of the nineteenth century.
If you want to know what the legalization of drugs in America will be like the place to study is China. The country was completely debilitated by the forceful legalization of opium by the British. Mao remembered.
I can’t believe that idiot could have so little respect for his country’s heritage that he would smash and burn and try to efface all memory of the past but that is what he did. But then, perhaps, he thought that as the old China had failed inn its imperial mission everything had to be destroyed and built up in victory anew. I really haven’t studied Mao’s psychology at all.
It would be almost impossible for a Westerner to penetrate the Eastern mind.
That’s an example of the Liberal racism I’m talking about. It isn’t difficult at all. If Freud and Jung proved anything at all it is the universality of psychology. Hey, we’ve all got ninety-nine point six the same genes, right? There are only so many psychological types no matter within which racial configuration and the response to the natural world is universally the same no matter in what symbols it is expressed.
What good does it do us to have acquired this tremendous scientific knowledge if we don’t apply it. That is the question.
At the same time as the Cultural Revolution within China the Chinese colonization of the world began in earnest. Numbers of colonies have been established in South Americ while colonies in Vancouver, Toronto, London, Paris, New York, San Francisco, LA and other points in the world are being increased on a daily basis. The invasion of Africa has begun in earnest.
The Chinese will not have the manpower shortage that the English had because they have a reservoir of a billion and a half people. If they sent a hundred million people each to Europe, America, South America and Africa today they wouldn’t even begin to release the population pressure in China. But they woud effectively politically dominate the entire world.
Let’s go back to Madison Grant and his theory of racial exclusion. You have these local exclusions going on in Africa and Sebia as well actually as China. The Chinese are systematically exterminating racial minorities within China. Yu have a national exclusion going on in South Africa where the Whites are being ejected by the Bantus while Americans Black and White, cheer.
And you actively have a global struggle for dominance going on which is being won and probably will be won by the Chinese.
Now, let’s go back to the Honky Cat in San Francisco at the Gate of Wine.
In his analysis of the probable results of the Immigration Act of sixty-five the Chinese were the big problem.
I don’t remember if he considered the effect of Moslem and Hindu immigration but what results we’ve had there. You Liberals and Reds really achieved one there.
(testily) How’s that?
Well, we conservatives were moving along pretty well in getting the Shah of Iran to bring his country into the twentieth century. He was soing a good job of eliminating idiotic antiquated Moslem notions. Women had made good progress; education was on a modern basis. However there was the usual and to be expected reactionary religious backlash.
The Ayatollah working of that haven of bloodthirsty criminal politicians, Paris…
Hold it, hold it. You aren’t going to defame Paris, the City of Light, are you?
I don’t defame anyone, Craig. I deal in facts. Paris was the birthplace of the Jacobins of Ninety-three who lived on blood puddings and in recent years the Ayatollah. Ho Chi Mihn and Pol Pot amongst others had asylum there for years. They have all been notoriously murderous or genocidal. For what it’s worth Pol Pot who murdered a huge percentage of his own countrymen has never been apprehended and punished. He lives in luxury in his own country. This worse than Hitler is living in luxury in his own country. The Shah was denied asylum anywhere and allowed to be murdered by Moslem fanatics. They wouldn’t even let him come to the New York that harbored Leon Trotsky, another huge genocidist. I hear no outcries from Liberals.
Whether it is the Parisian inheritance of Ninety-three or indigenous to the Communist type you can take your choice but I opt for both. I mean, how stupid can you be, American Liberals rail at the Chinese for violations of human rights. By whose standard? The Chinese government is Red. It follows the party line to the letter. The same thing will happen here if we let the Reds take over. They have their own program.
At any the Ayatollah working out of Paris with the incomprehensible aid of American Liberals and Reds set out to overthrow the Shah. Now think about that. Liberals aiding the revolution of a reactionary religious leader. Reds doing the same. Liberals negating the Shah’s revisions which they will practically kill for in the United States. What is wrong with this picture?
The Shah, who was a very good and decent man was willfully and criminally vilified by you Liberals and Reds.
Iranians flooded into our country with the immigration bars gone where they turned our universities and streets into bedlam in support of this insane reactionary fanatic. Nobody examined the facts they just accepted ad hominem insults.
I will never forgive you Liberals for what you did.
In a shameful reversal of policy our elected representatives cowardly withdrew support from its own creature, the Shah, going so far as to refuse him safe asylum Leon Trotsky was allowed, not to mention the religious nut, the Dalai Lama, and John Lennon but the Shah was exposed to his vile ante-diluvian enemies who slaughtered him like on of their so-called unclean pigs.
I have my head in shame for my country.
Then when that fundamentalis idiot the Ayatollah turned Iran into a reactionary hell you so-called Liberals disowned the situation by saying: We only help them get their freedom; what they do with it is their business. Fie! You Liberals should be ashamed of yourselves; you betray your own principles then laugh at them.
So now because of the Jewish sponsorship of the sixty-five immigration law we’re saddle by a large and growing Moslem population not to mention the stultified Hindus. I don’t have to remind you what happened when Britain left India.
You may have forgotten this little fact, Dewey, the Constitution of these United States of America guarantees freedom of religion so I don’t know where you get off being so hard on Moslems nd Hindus.
The Constitution forbids the establishment of a State sponsored religion that’s all. The government is forbidden to pass laws benefiting any specific religion. That notion has been violated by these Loser or so-called Hate laws which give legal protection to certain faiths.
Besides as usual you Liberals willfully misunderstand and exaggerate. No one is denying anyone the right to practice any religion no matter how stupid. I even defended Jim Jones’ right to make his adherents commit suicide on the basis of freedom of religion.
Just because you have a right to practice a belief system doesn’t place that belief system above criticism. All religions are primitive in relation to Science. A Scientific Consciousness is superior to any superstitious Religious Consciousness.
I wouldn’t say that a religion is superstition.
You’ve got to be kidding, Craig. You used to. When you were in college you equated religion with superstition. What’s the matter? The Grim Reaper got you scared or are you turning superstitious.
I have reasons for beliving in eternal life.
Good. I don’t. Anyway importing millions more superstitious idiots has nothing to do with me accepting them as anything else but. All religions are intlerant, especially the Moslem, so all we’re doing is creating problems for ourselves down the road.
But to get back to the Honky Cat.
If you remember he said the legalizing of Chinese immigration would increase dramatically the number of illegal Chinese immigrants. All you have to do is watch the news to see he’s right.
He predicted that in fifty years San Francisco would be a Chinese city. He was right. Oakland too, he missed that. They’ll probably change Kearny Street to Mao Ze Dong Promenade. Union Square will be new Tianenmen Square.
I think there are more Chinese in San Francisco than there used to be but I don’t see them taking over the city.
There’s still a decade or so to go Craig. When I was there the Chinese were all in Chinatown but now they’ve also taken over the Sunset. That’s a huge territorial expansion.
Now, San Francisco’s population is limited to about seven hundred fifty thousand because of its small land area. If the Chinese land only fifteen thousand illegals a year, in fifteen years that would be two hundred twenty-five thousand additional people. When you add illegals and natural growth which will be huge bucause they come here, so they say, because they can have large families, you’re looking at three to four hundred thousand Chinese in addition to the two or three hundred thousand already there.
If even more illegals come in you’re looking at an additional half million or more. That’s enough to force everyone, White, Black or Hispanic out of San Francisco.
You don’t think they didn’t have a good reason for claiming the Sunset for expansion do you?
What good reason?
The Sunset gives them a coastline. Transports don’t actually have to land. Lighters in the form of cruisers or yachts under White ownership can take them off in parties of twenty, thirty or sixty or more and land them unobtrusively. Given a thousand dollars or so per each the Chinese build up protection from White profiteers.
Once in possession of San Francisco there will be no way to stop them from landing Chinese at will.
Now, these are all Red Chinese.
They will have to be involved in the American political system. So, in addition to the Black Caucus, the Jewish Caucus, the Irish Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus and whatever you will have the Red Chinese Caucus with laws in place to deny a White Caucus to have any legal objections.
Once you have open Reds in Congress the White, Black and whatever else Reds will rally round the Chinese Reds who represent the mother lode of Reds in China. Then the conflict will come out into the open.
Once the Chines have legitmized their presence in the Bay Area larger numbers of Chinese will be sent over from China until the Chinese are in possession of the West Coast from British, by now Chinese Columbia or, perhaps, New Sinkiang down to Baja.
The racial rules propounded by Madison Grant will really take effect. With tens of thousand of Chinese arriving on a daily bais not only will Whites be excluded from the West Coast but also the Blacks and Mexicans. The nature of the racial ethic is the expulsion of al other differing peoples.
That’s a pretty grim scenario, Dewey, and I think a false one. Never forget that all men are brothers. Intolerance is a sin against our fellow man and a crime against all mankind. I don’t think the Chinese or anyone else is inferior to me on the basis of color. Race has no meaning in an enlightened America and a just world.
You’re absolutely correct Craig. Race wouldhave no meaning in an enlightened America and a just world. But, that’s not the naw the world is and that’s not how race works.
It isn’t a question of whether Blacks, Whites or Yellows are inferior or superior. Race or culture works on a subliminal level. People want their world to reflect only their kind whether you’re willing to acknowledge the fact or not. Goodwill while admirable will have no effect on the future.
Whites take a more cosmopolitan point of view largely because it was thrust upon them. The Europeans didn’t have the man power to displace the indigenous peoples when they got there so they had to come to an accommodation with the locals to enforce their possession.
In America they or we had the numbers to roll over the sparse population of American Indians. In East India the British had to employ native troops as well as their own to enforce their rule. Even then half the British Army was made up of Irishers who took the Queen’s Uniform to escape the rigors of the potato famine.
The Chinese who have been massed in their native land have no such cosmopolitan view. The British in India could not have succeeded unless their vision of society was more just to more Indian than Indian society had been. The British rule must have been less oppressive than that of the Indians or no Indians would have rallied to their flag. That goes without saying.
In addition European Science went so far beyond Indian metaphysics that the British commanded respect on that score alone. However Science is only knowledge aznd an approach to knowledge which can be learned closing that gap or superiority.
Both the Indians and Chinese have done that at least on a superficial level…
Superficial? You mean you don’t think they’ve really grasped it?
Racial values, Craig, racial imprinting. It is axiomatic that you can’t learn what you don’t already know. The European grasp of Science is bred in the bone. Our conception of Science was developed by our Aryan ancestors in the Middle East. It is inherited directly from Greco-Egyptian culture.
The scientific concept is indigenous to no other people, nor can it be learned in the half dozen generations or so that other peoples have been struggling with it for at least three or four hundred years and they haven’t mastered it yet.
The concepts haven’t even scratched the surface of the African soul and may not have made too deep an impression on the American Blacks. I don’t think American Blacks would maintain American achievements if Whites were gone.
The Indians will return to Hindu metaphysical concepts as soon as the scientific impusle is removed. Their culture is set. The same with the Chinese. Just as the Chinese have expelled Whites from the Orient so as they expel Whites throughout the world they will reject scientific principles as un-Chinese. Their success against the proples of the world will prove the superiority of their ways just as the European successes proved he superiority of their ways. However Europeans lacked to manpower to displace other peoples which the Chinese possess.
You see, Craig, even if you and I do not think we are innately superior to them, they don’t share our generosity of spirit. They know that they are superior to us.
So, you see, the Honky Cat actually knew what he was talking about.
I still think brotherhood will triumph. It’s the right way.
It is that attitude which has stripped the White race of the ability to either resist or to assert itself. The ideal of brotherhood which you profess is above reproach as an ideal. In an ideal world of ideal people the vision would have been realized long ago. That it hasn’t proves that it is a beautiful but unrealizable ideal.
The notion is intellectual while race is visceral. I admire the ideal and I wish well to all those who sincerely believe it but you will be rolled over like the America of old and you will take your race with you.
You have stripped our race of all pride and self-respect in favor of other races who either hate or despise you. They do not share your altruism. You have turned your women into whores for the entertainment of abject peoples; you have made your sons subject to all others. You have passed laws which enslave them. They dare not assert their ability against any other people upon pain of humiliation and emasculation by their own in their own homeland.
If they assert their manhood at all they will be sent to a diversity training vlass where they will be taught they are nothing with no rights while all others are their moral superiors.
They have to defer to criminals like the Spade Cat, some Moslem from the desert, some Chinaman who will be insulted because you refer to him as an ‘Oriental’ when in reality you should be referring to him as an ‘Asian.’ Not an Asiatic but an Asian. Next week you will be shown your political incorrectness when he is given a new PC name. That’s how they keep you in line.
Oh, by the way, if Chinaman is an insult why isn’t an Englishman.
I don’t know who your Commissars are but they shouldn’t change the rules so often.
Well, Dewey, I can see where the Honky Cat made a deep impression on you but I hope none of this puts a damper on our friendship.
No need for that. But now maybe we can go back and integrate all this into the psychological cluster I mentioned a while back
End of Story.